commentators who have stressed the possible benefits to children of exposure to nudity
- forsythbragg13jfud
- Jul 12, 2020
- 3 min read
in the dwelling, in places such as later sexual performance, and ability for affection and
Closeness (cf. Finch, 1982; Goodson, 1991; Martinson, 1977; Mead, mentioned in Goodson,
1991). Although some of these writers (cf. Ellis, cited in Goodson, 1991) make reference
to the cross-cultural ubiquity of youth exposure to parental nudity - although
objecting to alarmist positions taken by Western commentators who don't supply
Supporting data - the cross cultural record is not typically explicit on the question of
actual exposure of children to parental nudity. It does, however, present a powerful claim for
Caudill and Plath, 1966; Gardner, 1975; Lozoff et al., 1998; Morelli et al., 1992;
Stephens, 1972; Whiting, 1964; Whiting and Edwards, 1988). It may tentatively be
inferred that under such conditions large numbers of the world's inhabitants of children
are exposed to parental nudity. Lastly, a third group of writers stress the significance of
the context in which childhood exposure to nudity happens, insisting that results are
mediated by such contextual variables as sex, age of child, family climate, ethnic
Exposure to Scenes of Parental Sexuality (Primal Scenes)
Freud and his followers chose the term "primal scenes" to refer to visual or auditory
exposure of children to parental sex, and following dream elaborations on the
event (Dahl, 1982). Despite the identification of such exposure by psychoanalysts and
others as uniquely dangerous to the mental health of kids, there are, once again, short
We could find only one
prevalence study (Rosenfeld et al., 1980) and two studies of initial result and
subsequent adult performance (Hoyt, 1978, 1979). Of http://wolftoothranch.com/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=hotnudist.xyz/category/uncategorized/page/3/ , amounts of case studies
exist, including a very abundant psychoanalytic literature describing putative consequences of
exposure to primal scenes. These writers have described the traumatagenic issues by
referring to "a) the erotically charged character of the exposure, resulting in undischarged
libidinal energy and concomitant stress; b) the sadomasochistic content of fantasy
misinterpretation of the occasion; and c) the exacerbation of oedipal want and resultant
castration anxiety or other anxieties of retaliation" (Okami, 1995, p. 56).
Again, however, the few attempts to validate these ideas empirically do not support
predictions of harm.
psychological damage has been exaggerated. click arrived at their
Ending by two routes: First, exposure to primal scenes appeared to be rather
Common, with the most conservative estimates as high as 41%.
suggested that given this frequency of event, variables aside from the primal scene qua
primal scene must be responsible for trauma when it occurs. Second, parents reported
Mostly neutral and noncomprehending reactions from their little children [Mathematical
Expression Omitted]. On the other hand, some children seemed to react with
amusement, giggling, and clear comprehension. Hence, the rather dark portrait appearing
from psychoanalytic literature was mostly absent from these parent reports.
Hoyt (1978, 1979) queried college students about their youth exposure to scenes of
parental sexuality. He found that although these students reported that their exposure had
resulted in mostly negative psychological responses at the time, the exposed group didn't
differ from the nonexposed group on self-report ratings of "present well-being" or
frequency of and satisfaction with present sexual relations. Additionally, these subjects
recalled exposure chiefly at prepubescent and pubertal ages. Given that the mean ages
4 and 6, it is conceivable that subjects in Hoyt's investigations weren't reporting their
first actual exposure to scenes of parental sexuality. Therefore, findings of exposure at
peripubertal ages are of limited value in assessing outcome of exposure to primal scenes
Typically, because with a few exceptions, primal scenes are defined in the
literature as events of early childhood. That is, responses for example "castration anxiety" and
"Oedipal desires" are said to be of most essential significance in the lives of quite young
children.
The Current Study
Despite the lack of empirical support, psychoanalytic and family systems theorists
continue to stress the potential for harm in exposure to parental nudity and primal scenes.
Therefore, longitudinal outcome data are important in starting to solve this issue.
Comments